NHS Highland is to launch an eight-week consultation period on its draft Gaelic Language Plan on August 24.
Policy Development Manager Caroline Tolan said: “We will be seeking views from people across the NHS Highland area. We have developed a draft plan, which covers what we think the organisation could do to promote Gaelic use, and serve our Gaelic speaking patients better.
“We encourage all comments on the draft plan through our website (www.nhshighland.scot.nhs.uk). Anyone who is unable to contribute online, is asked to phone or write in with their views. We are also looking at the possibility of organising some small focus groups if there is sufficient demand. We welcome responses in Gaelic and English.
“To date, some of the options we are looking at include having Gaelic television and radio available at the bedside for patients in hospital and ensuring that people who write to us can choose to receive a response in Gaelic or English. “
The Gaelic language plan is being prepared in response to the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005, agreed by the Scottish Parliament. Bòrd na Gàidhlig has the authority to require organisations to prepare statutory Gaelic Language Plans.
NHS Highland is required to produce a Gaelic Language Plan by the end of 2009.
NHS Chair Garry Coutts said: “We will seek to be as creative as possible in our support for Gaelic, but we will, of course, do this in the context of our primary functions of health improvement and the provision of health care. We also need to reflect our current corporate priorities.
“We are preparing this plan with funding from external sources, and it does not impact on our own financial situation.”
The deadline for submitting comments is October 22.
Thursday, 27 August 2009
HIE SURVEY REVEALS YOUNG PEOPLE'S VIEWS OF THE HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS
The majority of young people with Highlands and Islands connections have a deep sense of pride and feel secure in the region, according to the first ever detailed survey of opinions on the subject.
But the survey commissioned by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) also shows many of them think they may have to leave to pursue their educational and career ambitions.
Around 3,500 people aged between 15 and 30 were asked for their views to determine what factors influence them to leave, to remain or to come to the region.
HIE's regional competitiveness director Alex Paterson explained: "This is the first time there has been an in-depth examination of the push and pull factors affecting the ambitions of young people. Demographic studies show a high number of people return here when they are proposing to have a family of their own or later in life, but we have, in proportion to the Scottish average, 25 per cent fewer people aged 15 to 30.
"We wanted to get a detailed picture of attitudes to share with partners to help shape the region to be attractive to every age group, particularly one so vital to economic growth."
The survey shows that young people are generally more positive than negative about life in the Highlands and Islands but perceive there to be limited educational or employment opportunities.
Seventy-two percent of those surveyed said they are proud to be associated with the Highlands and Islands regardless of whether they live in the region and 82% feel it is a good place to bring up a family.
The Highlands and Islands more than lives up to the expectations of those returning or coming to live in the region for the first time, with 86% of those surveyed saying that it meets or exceeds all of their expectations, and more than three-quarters saying they intend to stay for at least five years.
Sub-regional differences are also evident, with young people in and around Inverness most positive about economic opportunities while those on the west are more concerned about their prospects. However, the distinct way of life in island and remote mainland areas engenders highly positive perceptions among many of those born and brought up there.
The report indicates that current trends show a net 6.3% loss of 16-20 year olds each year from the region - equivalent to 1,560 people. However, out-migration is counterbalanced, in many areas, by in-migration of people in the 20s, 30s and early 40s.
The picture is not uniform across the region - residents appear to return sooner to the Inner Moray Firth area and Argyll and the Islands, while other areas such as Orkney, the Outer Hebrides, Caithness and Shetland take longer to recover residency figures. However, Orkney and Shetland are perceived most positively for providing good job opportunities while the Outer Hebrides come out top as a good place to be for teenagers. Lochaber, Skye and Wester Ross are considered places, above others, where it is alright to be 'different'.
Almost half the total sample said they feel access to education and training opportunities in the region is poor and there is a perception of a lack of well-paid jobs with one respondent claiming: "You shouldn’t have to make sacrifices in your career and earning potential just to be able to live in the place you have grown up and have family."
Housing availability and affordability is a recurring concern across the region and the perception that house prices are lower than elsewhere proves to be outdated with the average price in 2008 in the Highlands and Islands (£147,600) being 95% of the Scottish average.
While key reasons for moving away are linked to educational opportunities and job prospects, many are committed to leaving to gain life experience.
The report cites three suggested areas that could be strengthened to attract those who are more undecided about their future;
These include:
* Education - raising the emphasis of current further and higher education provision and developing the potential of the UHI Millennium Institute for students in and from outside the region;
* Employment - improving perception of local employment; promoting other routes such as self-employment and raising awareness of prospects in traditional and emerging sectors;
* Environment - working to improve access to affordable housing, enhancing public transport, and promoting the region's unique culture, natural assets and its city.
The report points to the importance of engaging with young people on these themes at an appropriate time in their lives.
The report's findings were considered by the HIE board this week, and will be discussed with the Scottish Government and other agency, academic and local government partners.
Alex Paterson continued: "It is clear that some of the key factors driving out-migration of young people involve issues that policy-makers can influence - education and training; employment; housing and transport, and this report provides evidence to support decision-making in these areas. The finding that the majority (86%) of school leavers who plan to move to other parts of Scotland intend to do so for higher or further education purposes reinforces the role that our new university will play in population growth.
"It shows that our region has similar challenges to other rural areas but also has a great deal to offer young people, and we need to capitalise on these assets to retain our young people and attract those from other areas seeking new experiences."
But the survey commissioned by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) also shows many of them think they may have to leave to pursue their educational and career ambitions.
Around 3,500 people aged between 15 and 30 were asked for their views to determine what factors influence them to leave, to remain or to come to the region.
HIE's regional competitiveness director Alex Paterson explained: "This is the first time there has been an in-depth examination of the push and pull factors affecting the ambitions of young people. Demographic studies show a high number of people return here when they are proposing to have a family of their own or later in life, but we have, in proportion to the Scottish average, 25 per cent fewer people aged 15 to 30.
"We wanted to get a detailed picture of attitudes to share with partners to help shape the region to be attractive to every age group, particularly one so vital to economic growth."
The survey shows that young people are generally more positive than negative about life in the Highlands and Islands but perceive there to be limited educational or employment opportunities.
Seventy-two percent of those surveyed said they are proud to be associated with the Highlands and Islands regardless of whether they live in the region and 82% feel it is a good place to bring up a family.
The Highlands and Islands more than lives up to the expectations of those returning or coming to live in the region for the first time, with 86% of those surveyed saying that it meets or exceeds all of their expectations, and more than three-quarters saying they intend to stay for at least five years.
Sub-regional differences are also evident, with young people in and around Inverness most positive about economic opportunities while those on the west are more concerned about their prospects. However, the distinct way of life in island and remote mainland areas engenders highly positive perceptions among many of those born and brought up there.
The report indicates that current trends show a net 6.3% loss of 16-20 year olds each year from the region - equivalent to 1,560 people. However, out-migration is counterbalanced, in many areas, by in-migration of people in the 20s, 30s and early 40s.
The picture is not uniform across the region - residents appear to return sooner to the Inner Moray Firth area and Argyll and the Islands, while other areas such as Orkney, the Outer Hebrides, Caithness and Shetland take longer to recover residency figures. However, Orkney and Shetland are perceived most positively for providing good job opportunities while the Outer Hebrides come out top as a good place to be for teenagers. Lochaber, Skye and Wester Ross are considered places, above others, where it is alright to be 'different'.
Almost half the total sample said they feel access to education and training opportunities in the region is poor and there is a perception of a lack of well-paid jobs with one respondent claiming: "You shouldn’t have to make sacrifices in your career and earning potential just to be able to live in the place you have grown up and have family."
Housing availability and affordability is a recurring concern across the region and the perception that house prices are lower than elsewhere proves to be outdated with the average price in 2008 in the Highlands and Islands (£147,600) being 95% of the Scottish average.
While key reasons for moving away are linked to educational opportunities and job prospects, many are committed to leaving to gain life experience.
The report cites three suggested areas that could be strengthened to attract those who are more undecided about their future;
These include:
* Education - raising the emphasis of current further and higher education provision and developing the potential of the UHI Millennium Institute for students in and from outside the region;
* Employment - improving perception of local employment; promoting other routes such as self-employment and raising awareness of prospects in traditional and emerging sectors;
* Environment - working to improve access to affordable housing, enhancing public transport, and promoting the region's unique culture, natural assets and its city.
The report points to the importance of engaging with young people on these themes at an appropriate time in their lives.
The report's findings were considered by the HIE board this week, and will be discussed with the Scottish Government and other agency, academic and local government partners.
Alex Paterson continued: "It is clear that some of the key factors driving out-migration of young people involve issues that policy-makers can influence - education and training; employment; housing and transport, and this report provides evidence to support decision-making in these areas. The finding that the majority (86%) of school leavers who plan to move to other parts of Scotland intend to do so for higher or further education purposes reinforces the role that our new university will play in population growth.
"It shows that our region has similar challenges to other rural areas but also has a great deal to offer young people, and we need to capitalise on these assets to retain our young people and attract those from other areas seeking new experiences."
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
NFUS says - SHEEP FARMERS FLOCK TO OPENING EID ROADSHOW
More than 130 sheep farmers attended the opening NFU Scotland/NSA Scotland roadshow meeting in Thainstone, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire last night to receive an update on controversial EU proposals on sheep movements and electronic identification (EID). The roadshow will move on to Stirling, Perth and Oban in the next few days with further meetings around Scotland next week.
Due to demand, next week’s meeting in the Borders, taking place on Tuesday, 1 September at 7.30pm, has been moved to a bigger venue and will now be held in the auction mart at Newton St Boswells courtesy of John Swan Ltd.
European Regulation 21/2004, due to come into force from the end of this year, will make it obligatory for all Scottish sheep keepers to electronically tag sheep born after this date and keep a record of each animal’s individual identity every time they move. Derogation from electronic tagging may be available for lambs entering the food chain.
NFU Scotland and NSA Scotland believe the new rules will bring no real benefit and the proposals are soundly opposed by the whole Scottish sheep sector.
Speaking after the meeting in Thainstone, NFU Scotland Vice-President Nigel Miller said:
“We continue to oppose the regulations at a European level, and we are working closely with Scottish Government to look at where further flexibility may lie within the regulation. Much has been said about electronic identification (EID) and confusion is understandably rife over exactly what the regulations will require producers to do.
“These meetings help set out what the responsibilities of producers are likely to be from 1 January 2010. There are still some uncertainties depending upon how the regulation is implemented here in Scotland and the Scottish Government’s own consultation on this is expected soon.
“It is already clear from our first meeting that the feedback we receive from sheep producers at these roadshows will be crucial when it comes to responding to the Scottish Government consultation. If Scottish sheep farmers have to accept this damaging regulation, then a more pragmatic system and a significant amount of flexibility will be required if further erosion to the numbers of sheep kept in Scotland is to be avoided.
“Every sheep farmer is encouraged to attend one of these meetings, turnout at Thainstone was excellent and we have been forced to move our meeting in the Borders to John Swan’s auction market at Newton St Boswells to cater for the expected numbers.”
Due to demand, next week’s meeting in the Borders, taking place on Tuesday, 1 September at 7.30pm, has been moved to a bigger venue and will now be held in the auction mart at Newton St Boswells courtesy of John Swan Ltd.
European Regulation 21/2004, due to come into force from the end of this year, will make it obligatory for all Scottish sheep keepers to electronically tag sheep born after this date and keep a record of each animal’s individual identity every time they move. Derogation from electronic tagging may be available for lambs entering the food chain.
NFU Scotland and NSA Scotland believe the new rules will bring no real benefit and the proposals are soundly opposed by the whole Scottish sheep sector.
Speaking after the meeting in Thainstone, NFU Scotland Vice-President Nigel Miller said:
“We continue to oppose the regulations at a European level, and we are working closely with Scottish Government to look at where further flexibility may lie within the regulation. Much has been said about electronic identification (EID) and confusion is understandably rife over exactly what the regulations will require producers to do.
“These meetings help set out what the responsibilities of producers are likely to be from 1 January 2010. There are still some uncertainties depending upon how the regulation is implemented here in Scotland and the Scottish Government’s own consultation on this is expected soon.
“It is already clear from our first meeting that the feedback we receive from sheep producers at these roadshows will be crucial when it comes to responding to the Scottish Government consultation. If Scottish sheep farmers have to accept this damaging regulation, then a more pragmatic system and a significant amount of flexibility will be required if further erosion to the numbers of sheep kept in Scotland is to be avoided.
“Every sheep farmer is encouraged to attend one of these meetings, turnout at Thainstone was excellent and we have been forced to move our meeting in the Borders to John Swan’s auction market at Newton St Boswells to cater for the expected numbers.”
Bòrd na Gàidhlig a’ cur fàilte air làn-thasgadh sna sgoiltean Gàidhlig
Tha Bòrd na Gàidhlig air fàilte a chur air an naidheachd bho Mhinistear na Gàidhlig, Michael Russell, gum bi Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd a’ faotainn buannachd bho riarachadh de £1.5 millean airson solar ann an sgìre na Gàidhealtachd a mheudachadh.
Bidh an tasgadh ùr bho Mhaoin Calpa Sgoiltean Gàidhlig a’ cruthachadh barrachd àiteachan ann am foghlam Gàidhlig air feadh na dùthcha agus bidh Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd a’ comharrachadh làraich fhreagarrach a dh’aithghearr airson sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth a stèidheachadh ann am Port Rìgh agus sa Ghearasdan. Bheir am maoineachadh seo cead don Chomhairle adhartas a luathachadh air na pròiseactan sin.
Thuirt Art MacCarmaig, Cathraiche Bhòrd na Gàidhlig: “Tha mi a’ cur fàilte air an naidheachd bho Mhìcheal Russell an-diugh a thaobh riarachadh de £1.5m de mhaoin calpa a thaobh Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd a chuideachadh gus sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth a stèidheachadh anns a’ Ghearasdan agus ann am Port Rìgh. Tha Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd ri moladh airson stèidheachadh dà sgoil Ghàidhlig ro 2011 a bhith mar aon de na prìomh phròiseactan an taobh a-staigh a’ Phlana mhath Gàidhlig aca, agus tha Bòrd na Gàidhlig air a bhith a’ cur taic ri oidhirpean bhuidhnean de Chomann nam Pàrant anns an dà sgìre gus na sgoiltean sin a chur air bhonn.”
“Aig àm nan co-chomhairlean reachdail a chaidh a chumail san dà sgìre an-uiridh, rinn am Bòrd am beachd soilleir gum biodh feum air barrachd sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth ma tha sinn a’ dol a thogail ginealach ùr de luchd-labhairt na Gàidhlig. Tha am beachd seo ann an co-chòrdadh ri amas nam Ministearan ann a bhith a’ dèanamh cinnteach às ginealach ùr de luchd-labhairt. Tha sgoiltean fa leth a’ tairgsinn mòran a bharrachd chothroman air briathrachas nas fharsainge fhaotainn agus nas motha cleachdaidh a dhèanamh air a’ Ghàidhlig taobh a-muigh an t-seòmair-sgoile.
Bu chòir gum brosnaicheadh barrachd cothrom air a’ chànan a chleachdadh nas motha miann gus a chleachdadh, nì a tha deatamach ma tha sinn a’ dol a thogail ginealach de dhaoine òga a bhios a’ cleachdadh na Gàidhlig gu cunbhalach.”
Thuirt Mgr MacCarmaig cuideachd gun robh am Bòrd a’ coimhead air an leasachadh làithreach seo mar cheum shònraichte ann an gnìomhachadh Plana Nàiseanta na Gàidhlig, le bhith a’ tairgsinn taic do phàrantan ann an coimhearsnachdan far a bheilear air a bhith a’ sireadh sgoiltean Gàidhlig rè ùine gus an coilean iad an aon ìre de fhàs agus de shoirbheachadh ris na sgoiltean ann an Glaschu agus Inbhir Nis.
Chuir e ris an sin: “Bu toil le Bòrd na Gàidhlig ùghdarrasan ionadail air feadh na h-Alba fhaicinn a’ tòiseachadh air feumalachdan foghlam tro mheadhan na Gàidhlig anns na sgìrean aca a ghabhail os làimh, leis an amas a bhith ag adhartachadh chothroman agus ruigsinneachd air a’ Ghàidhlig. Tha fìor eisimpleir den seo ann an Lannraig a Tuath aig an àm seo. Tha sinn mothachail de rannsachadh anns na h-Eileanan Siar o chionn ghoirid, far an robh mar eisimpleir, a’ mhòr-chuid de phàrantan ann an grunn choimhearsnachdan a’ cur air adhart am beachd gum bu chòir an sgoil san sgìre aca a bhith na sgoil Ghàidhlig. Tha sinn cuideachd a’ cur taic ri Comann nam Pàrant ann an Dùn Èideann far am faodadh sgoil Ghàidhlig fa leth a bhith gu tur freagarrach. Tha sinn an dòchas gun samhlaich stèidheachadh dà sgoil ùr air a’ Ghàidhealtachd soirbheachadh Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig Inbhir Nis agus Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig Ghlaschu, agus gun toir e misneachd do phàrantan anns gach àite a dhol a dheasbad ri an ùghdarrais ionadail a thaobh sgoil Ghàidhlig sa choimhearsnachd aca fhèin
Bidh an tasgadh ùr bho Mhaoin Calpa Sgoiltean Gàidhlig a’ cruthachadh barrachd àiteachan ann am foghlam Gàidhlig air feadh na dùthcha agus bidh Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd a’ comharrachadh làraich fhreagarrach a dh’aithghearr airson sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth a stèidheachadh ann am Port Rìgh agus sa Ghearasdan. Bheir am maoineachadh seo cead don Chomhairle adhartas a luathachadh air na pròiseactan sin.
Thuirt Art MacCarmaig, Cathraiche Bhòrd na Gàidhlig: “Tha mi a’ cur fàilte air an naidheachd bho Mhìcheal Russell an-diugh a thaobh riarachadh de £1.5m de mhaoin calpa a thaobh Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd a chuideachadh gus sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth a stèidheachadh anns a’ Ghearasdan agus ann am Port Rìgh. Tha Comhairle na Gàidhealtachd ri moladh airson stèidheachadh dà sgoil Ghàidhlig ro 2011 a bhith mar aon de na prìomh phròiseactan an taobh a-staigh a’ Phlana mhath Gàidhlig aca, agus tha Bòrd na Gàidhlig air a bhith a’ cur taic ri oidhirpean bhuidhnean de Chomann nam Pàrant anns an dà sgìre gus na sgoiltean sin a chur air bhonn.”
“Aig àm nan co-chomhairlean reachdail a chaidh a chumail san dà sgìre an-uiridh, rinn am Bòrd am beachd soilleir gum biodh feum air barrachd sgoiltean Gàidhlig fa leth ma tha sinn a’ dol a thogail ginealach ùr de luchd-labhairt na Gàidhlig. Tha am beachd seo ann an co-chòrdadh ri amas nam Ministearan ann a bhith a’ dèanamh cinnteach às ginealach ùr de luchd-labhairt. Tha sgoiltean fa leth a’ tairgsinn mòran a bharrachd chothroman air briathrachas nas fharsainge fhaotainn agus nas motha cleachdaidh a dhèanamh air a’ Ghàidhlig taobh a-muigh an t-seòmair-sgoile.
Bu chòir gum brosnaicheadh barrachd cothrom air a’ chànan a chleachdadh nas motha miann gus a chleachdadh, nì a tha deatamach ma tha sinn a’ dol a thogail ginealach de dhaoine òga a bhios a’ cleachdadh na Gàidhlig gu cunbhalach.”
Thuirt Mgr MacCarmaig cuideachd gun robh am Bòrd a’ coimhead air an leasachadh làithreach seo mar cheum shònraichte ann an gnìomhachadh Plana Nàiseanta na Gàidhlig, le bhith a’ tairgsinn taic do phàrantan ann an coimhearsnachdan far a bheilear air a bhith a’ sireadh sgoiltean Gàidhlig rè ùine gus an coilean iad an aon ìre de fhàs agus de shoirbheachadh ris na sgoiltean ann an Glaschu agus Inbhir Nis.
Chuir e ris an sin: “Bu toil le Bòrd na Gàidhlig ùghdarrasan ionadail air feadh na h-Alba fhaicinn a’ tòiseachadh air feumalachdan foghlam tro mheadhan na Gàidhlig anns na sgìrean aca a ghabhail os làimh, leis an amas a bhith ag adhartachadh chothroman agus ruigsinneachd air a’ Ghàidhlig. Tha fìor eisimpleir den seo ann an Lannraig a Tuath aig an àm seo. Tha sinn mothachail de rannsachadh anns na h-Eileanan Siar o chionn ghoirid, far an robh mar eisimpleir, a’ mhòr-chuid de phàrantan ann an grunn choimhearsnachdan a’ cur air adhart am beachd gum bu chòir an sgoil san sgìre aca a bhith na sgoil Ghàidhlig. Tha sinn cuideachd a’ cur taic ri Comann nam Pàrant ann an Dùn Èideann far am faodadh sgoil Ghàidhlig fa leth a bhith gu tur freagarrach. Tha sinn an dòchas gun samhlaich stèidheachadh dà sgoil ùr air a’ Ghàidhealtachd soirbheachadh Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig Inbhir Nis agus Bun-sgoil Ghàidhlig Ghlaschu, agus gun toir e misneachd do phàrantan anns gach àite a dhol a dheasbad ri an ùghdarrais ionadail a thaobh sgoil Ghàidhlig sa choimhearsnachd aca fhèin
Monday, 24 August 2009
MATHER CRITICISES " LABOUR'S PROPERTY TAX"
The Labour Party's proposals for a Property Tax based on an
annual levy of 1% of the value of homes has been strongly criticised by
Jim Mather, MSP for Argyll & Bute as it could be shown that this would
result in a substantial increase for most residents. Compared to the
present Council Tax, which is under review by most politicians because
of its inherent unfairness, a Property Tax based on a 1% valuation would
result in tax increases across Argyll & Bute averaging just under 40%.
Jim Mather said:
"After defending the status quo of the Council Tax for
many years the Labour Party has eventually conceded that it should be
replaced. Remarkably for a party that used to embrace the concepts of
justice and fairness they have resolutely refused to consider a tax
based on the ability to pay and their opposition to the SNP policy of a
Local Income Tax is a reflection of this. Recent reports are that they
are now looking at proposals to levy a tax on individual households
based on 1% annually of the assessed value.
When this proposal came under attack Labour initially
denied that this was more than "an option" that they were considering
but the figures that are being quoted are based on the work of the Burt
Committee. Sir Peter Burt was appointed by the Labour/Liberal Democrat
administration and reported in 2006 that a levy based on 1% valuation
would be required to bring in the equivalent level of income required to
replace the Council tax.
As this tax is based on property value it takes no
account of ability to pay or of the number of earners within a
household. It would impact most unfavourably on single occupants and the
less well off. Any improvements to property would result in spiralling
taxation. Another side effect, forecast by the Burt Report, suggested
that the re-introduction of a property based tax would reduce house
prices by around 15%. That would result in chaos in an already fragile
property market.
This proposal is ill considered. When it was first
floated it was dismissed out of hand by Jack McConnell, MSP, when he was
First Minister. It should be compared with the council tax freeze that
is presently in effect and the SNP aim to introduce a fair system
based on the ability to pay."
JIM MATHER MSP jim.mather.msp@scottish.parliament.uk
annual levy of 1% of the value of homes has been strongly criticised by
Jim Mather, MSP for Argyll & Bute as it could be shown that this would
result in a substantial increase for most residents. Compared to the
present Council Tax, which is under review by most politicians because
of its inherent unfairness, a Property Tax based on a 1% valuation would
result in tax increases across Argyll & Bute averaging just under 40%.
Jim Mather said:
"After defending the status quo of the Council Tax for
many years the Labour Party has eventually conceded that it should be
replaced. Remarkably for a party that used to embrace the concepts of
justice and fairness they have resolutely refused to consider a tax
based on the ability to pay and their opposition to the SNP policy of a
Local Income Tax is a reflection of this. Recent reports are that they
are now looking at proposals to levy a tax on individual households
based on 1% annually of the assessed value.
When this proposal came under attack Labour initially
denied that this was more than "an option" that they were considering
but the figures that are being quoted are based on the work of the Burt
Committee. Sir Peter Burt was appointed by the Labour/Liberal Democrat
administration and reported in 2006 that a levy based on 1% valuation
would be required to bring in the equivalent level of income required to
replace the Council tax.
As this tax is based on property value it takes no
account of ability to pay or of the number of earners within a
household. It would impact most unfavourably on single occupants and the
less well off. Any improvements to property would result in spiralling
taxation. Another side effect, forecast by the Burt Report, suggested
that the re-introduction of a property based tax would reduce house
prices by around 15%. That would result in chaos in an already fragile
property market.
This proposal is ill considered. When it was first
floated it was dismissed out of hand by Jack McConnell, MSP, when he was
First Minister. It should be compared with the council tax freeze that
is presently in effect and the SNP aim to introduce a fair system
based on the ability to pay."
JIM MATHER MSP jim.mather.msp@scottish.parliament.uk
BBC ALBA – WEEKLY PROGRAMME HIGHLIGHTS
Week: 36
Date: Saturday, 5 September – Friday, 11 September 2009
Title: Craobh nan Ubhal
Celebrating the life and music of Flora MacNeil, one of Scotland's greatest exponents of traditional Gaelic song. The programme explores the impact her talent and the rich vein of traditional Gaelic song have had on her life and also on the promotion of Gaelic language and culture in Scotland and further afield.
Transmitted: Saturday 5th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Title: Ola
A study of the impact of oil on the Scottish economy, communities and politics.
Transmitted: Monday 7th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Title: Balaich an Iasgaich
Life at sea for the 'fishing boys' of Uist. This film follows them through the summer months.
Transmitted: Tuesday 8th September 2009
Time: 21:00
Title: Breab
The teens are having a 'T - Breab' at T in the Park and they've packed their sunglasses and waterproofs just in case! Their challenge is to make and present a programme about festival life - can they secure an interview with a band and kick it with A list 'musos'?
Transmitted: Wednesday 9th September 2009
Time: 18:00
Title: Draibhearan
Life behind the wheel for heavy goods vehicle drivers in the Highlands.
Transmitted: Thursday 10th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Date: Saturday, 5 September – Friday, 11 September 2009
Title: Craobh nan Ubhal
Celebrating the life and music of Flora MacNeil, one of Scotland's greatest exponents of traditional Gaelic song. The programme explores the impact her talent and the rich vein of traditional Gaelic song have had on her life and also on the promotion of Gaelic language and culture in Scotland and further afield.
Transmitted: Saturday 5th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Title: Ola
A study of the impact of oil on the Scottish economy, communities and politics.
Transmitted: Monday 7th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Title: Balaich an Iasgaich
Life at sea for the 'fishing boys' of Uist. This film follows them through the summer months.
Transmitted: Tuesday 8th September 2009
Time: 21:00
Title: Breab
The teens are having a 'T - Breab' at T in the Park and they've packed their sunglasses and waterproofs just in case! Their challenge is to make and present a programme about festival life - can they secure an interview with a band and kick it with A list 'musos'?
Transmitted: Wednesday 9th September 2009
Time: 18:00
Title: Draibhearan
Life behind the wheel for heavy goods vehicle drivers in the Highlands.
Transmitted: Thursday 10th September 2009
Time: 22:00
Islay Jazz Festival Listings
Friday 11th September
Trygve Seim & Frode Halti / Laura Macdonald & Tom Bancroft
Celebrating Homecoming, Somerled, the Viking Lord of the Isles and Founder of the Clan Donald, we commission the top Norwegian saxophonist/composer and the top MacDonald. World Premiere!
5.30–6pm, Finlaggan, £5. 4.30pm - Guided walk around Finlaggan. Cost £2
Alan Barnes & Paul Harrison
Leading English saxophonist and top Scottish pianist play tunes by Duke Ellington and Thelonious Monk.
7.30–9pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £10 (£8)
The Source
International super band ranging from meditative improvising to tango, from folklore-inspired pieces to state of the art jazz. Atmospheric, melodic, and very special – the new faces of the legendary ECM label. First time in the UK.
8.30–10.30pm, Bruichladdich Hall, £10 (£8)
Subie Coleman & Kevin Mackenzie
Intimate and soulful vocals – laced with passion and brilliantly accompanied by guitarist.
9–10.30pm, Islay House, £8 (£6)
Saturday 12th September
Talk: Alan MacNiven & Arne Kruse
More Viking than you thought? The Scandinavian settlement on Islay. A talk by Islay/Norse specialists from University of Edinburgh’s School Of Scandinavian Studies.
10.00–11.00am, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, Free
Alan Barnes /Bruce Adams Quintet
Mainstream jazz, swing to bop, with two of England’s finest swinging musicians and sharpest jazz wits: saxophonist, Barnes and trumpeter, Adams.
noon–2.30pm, Portnahaven Hall, £10 (£8) Plus the legendary, homebaking lunch
Niki King sings Billie Holiday
King’s bluesy, smoky voice is the perfect vehicle to interpret the songs made famous by the most emotive of jazz singers: Billie Holiday.
4–6pm, Bunnahabhain Distillery, £10 (£8). 3pm - Distillery Tour. Please book in advance on 01496 640646
Trygve Seim & Frode Halti
The plangent cry of the saxophonist in duet with the accordion’s atmospheric timbre – an exploration of sounds and rhythms from folkloric to contemporary beats; from far north to deep south.
6.45–8pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £8 (£6)
Batchelors of Jazz
Great Traditional jazz night with Dave Batchelor’s Band, featuring trumpeter, Lennie Herd; clarinettist, Forrie Cairns and Alistair Macdonald on banjo and vocals.
8.30–10.30pm, Bruichladdich Hall, £10 (£8)
Laura Macdonald Sextet
World premiere of new suite commissioned from the saxophonist by Islay Jazz Festival and PRS Foundation. Beautiful tone poems overflowing with excitement and inventiveness.
9–11pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £10 (£8)
Sunday 13th September
Alfie's Raw Talent
Young collective emerging out of the current NYJOS hotbed, led by Jura's Alfie Perring (trumpet), with : Siobham Duncan (trumpet), Kirsty Duncan (tenor sax), Alanna McCuaig (piano), Brodie Jarvie (bass) and Stephen 'Hendo' Henderson (drums)
12.30–2pm, RSPB Centre, £7 (£5). 11:30am Birdwatching walk. Light lunches available.
Subie Coleman sings Esther Phillips
Arresting singer with hard hitting emotional punch pays homage to the great soul star Esther Phillips, with a jazz/soul Quintet.
12.30–2.30pm, Ardbeg Distillery, £10 (£8): Lunch menu available
Trio AAB
A seriously fun band exploring a whole range of influences – post Ornette bop, ECM jazz, Celtic folk, new beats. Tom Bancroft, Phil Bancroft and Kevin McKenzie.
4-5.30pm, Lagavulin Distillery, £8 (£6)
Perring, Edwards, Peters: Compound Fracture
Percussionist/guitarist, Giles Perring; Bassist, Simon Edwards and flute/
saxophonist, Finn Peters have a new band that draws on world, ambient and jazz music to create spacious melodies and improvisations.
6-7.30pm, Laphroaig Distillery, £8 (£6)
Alan Barnes/Phil Bancroft Band with special guest, Laura MacDonald and Sheena Swanson
Grand finale from saxophone stars whose virtuosity, warmth and humour make them the perfect final night hosts. Big swinging fun + a special set by Islay’s own vocal star, Sheena Swanson.
8.30–10.30pm, Machrie Hotel, £10 (£8)
Trygve Seim & Frode Halti / Laura Macdonald & Tom Bancroft
Celebrating Homecoming, Somerled, the Viking Lord of the Isles and Founder of the Clan Donald, we commission the top Norwegian saxophonist/composer and the top MacDonald. World Premiere!
5.30–6pm, Finlaggan, £5. 4.30pm - Guided walk around Finlaggan. Cost £2
Alan Barnes & Paul Harrison
Leading English saxophonist and top Scottish pianist play tunes by Duke Ellington and Thelonious Monk.
7.30–9pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £10 (£8)
The Source
International super band ranging from meditative improvising to tango, from folklore-inspired pieces to state of the art jazz. Atmospheric, melodic, and very special – the new faces of the legendary ECM label. First time in the UK.
8.30–10.30pm, Bruichladdich Hall, £10 (£8)
Subie Coleman & Kevin Mackenzie
Intimate and soulful vocals – laced with passion and brilliantly accompanied by guitarist.
9–10.30pm, Islay House, £8 (£6)
Saturday 12th September
Talk: Alan MacNiven & Arne Kruse
More Viking than you thought? The Scandinavian settlement on Islay. A talk by Islay/Norse specialists from University of Edinburgh’s School Of Scandinavian Studies.
10.00–11.00am, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, Free
Alan Barnes /Bruce Adams Quintet
Mainstream jazz, swing to bop, with two of England’s finest swinging musicians and sharpest jazz wits: saxophonist, Barnes and trumpeter, Adams.
noon–2.30pm, Portnahaven Hall, £10 (£8) Plus the legendary, homebaking lunch
Niki King sings Billie Holiday
King’s bluesy, smoky voice is the perfect vehicle to interpret the songs made famous by the most emotive of jazz singers: Billie Holiday.
4–6pm, Bunnahabhain Distillery, £10 (£8). 3pm - Distillery Tour. Please book in advance on 01496 640646
Trygve Seim & Frode Halti
The plangent cry of the saxophonist in duet with the accordion’s atmospheric timbre – an exploration of sounds and rhythms from folkloric to contemporary beats; from far north to deep south.
6.45–8pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £8 (£6)
Batchelors of Jazz
Great Traditional jazz night with Dave Batchelor’s Band, featuring trumpeter, Lennie Herd; clarinettist, Forrie Cairns and Alistair Macdonald on banjo and vocals.
8.30–10.30pm, Bruichladdich Hall, £10 (£8)
Laura Macdonald Sextet
World premiere of new suite commissioned from the saxophonist by Islay Jazz Festival and PRS Foundation. Beautiful tone poems overflowing with excitement and inventiveness.
9–11pm, Ionad Chalium Chille Ile, £10 (£8)
Sunday 13th September
Alfie's Raw Talent
Young collective emerging out of the current NYJOS hotbed, led by Jura's Alfie Perring (trumpet), with : Siobham Duncan (trumpet), Kirsty Duncan (tenor sax), Alanna McCuaig (piano), Brodie Jarvie (bass) and Stephen 'Hendo' Henderson (drums)
12.30–2pm, RSPB Centre, £7 (£5). 11:30am Birdwatching walk. Light lunches available.
Subie Coleman sings Esther Phillips
Arresting singer with hard hitting emotional punch pays homage to the great soul star Esther Phillips, with a jazz/soul Quintet.
12.30–2.30pm, Ardbeg Distillery, £10 (£8): Lunch menu available
Trio AAB
A seriously fun band exploring a whole range of influences – post Ornette bop, ECM jazz, Celtic folk, new beats. Tom Bancroft, Phil Bancroft and Kevin McKenzie.
4-5.30pm, Lagavulin Distillery, £8 (£6)
Perring, Edwards, Peters: Compound Fracture
Percussionist/guitarist, Giles Perring; Bassist, Simon Edwards and flute/
saxophonist, Finn Peters have a new band that draws on world, ambient and jazz music to create spacious melodies and improvisations.
6-7.30pm, Laphroaig Distillery, £8 (£6)
Alan Barnes/Phil Bancroft Band with special guest, Laura MacDonald and Sheena Swanson
Grand finale from saxophone stars whose virtuosity, warmth and humour make them the perfect final night hosts. Big swinging fun + a special set by Islay’s own vocal star, Sheena Swanson.
8.30–10.30pm, Machrie Hotel, £10 (£8)
NEW COMMUNTY COUNCIL SCHEME GETS GO-AHEAD
The Community Council structure in Argyll and Bute is to be strengthened following the agreement of a new policy document.
The new Scheme for the Establishment of Community Councils in Argyll and Bute was approved by the Council's Executive following a comprehensive review.
The Scheme sets out, in detail, the basis on which the local Community Council system will now operate.
Councillors also agreed that Community Council elections will take place on Thursday, October 29, unless a UK Parliamentary election is called before then.
The wide-ranging review aimed to ensure that Community Councils can make an effective contribution to community engagement and community planning developments which the Coucnil is promoting, giving Community Councils and communities a bigger say in how the Council and other public sector partners develop and shape services.
The review was progressed in two stages over a seven-month period and involved all Community Councils. The first stage was an “as is” look at how Community Councils operated, and the second invited all interested parties to comment on a “to be” vision for the future.
The Association of Argyll and Bute Community Councils was involved at every step of the review, with meetings being held to discuss progress and invite comments.
Council Leader Dick Walsh welcomed the adoption of the new Scheme, saying it was beneficial to the entire area to have as robust a Community Council structure as possible.
“The 56 distinct areas represented by our Community Councils provide a unique opportunity to get right to the heart of our local communities, and ensure that we plan in partnership for the future,” Councillor Walsh added.
“Community Councils have a vital role in the democratic process. The new Scheme will, I hope, strengthen their role as well as improve community representation and participation.”
He also urged members of the public to consider putting themselves forward for the October 29 elections, and Community Councils and existing Community Councillors to promote interest in standing for election.
“Being a Community Councillor is a very important role, and one which can be extremely rewarding,” Councillor Walsh said.
“Most people get involved to help improve their local area, whether by way of direct activities or by influencing decisions made by the Council and other public bodies.
“Argyll and Bute Council is committed to working closely with Community Councils to ensure that they can do this as effectively as possible.”
The new document incorporates model Standing Orders, a model Constitution, a list of Community Councils and a Best Practice Agreement, which includes a Code of Conduct for Community Councillors.
With the new structure in place, Community Councils are likely to have a role contributing to Argyll and Bute’s proposed Area Community Planning Groups. They will be able to make representations to public and private agencies more effectively on matters which they consider to be of local interest.
Councillor Walsh said: “Community Planning is about local organisations working together to improve services for their communities.
“Most importantly, it is about ensuring that local people are able to influence the decisions of the agencies which provide their services. That’s where Community Councils have a potentially major role to play.
“The Council places the Community Planning process very highly on its agenda. We want to see co-operation and partnership working have a positive impact on everyone’s lives and achieve sustainable, thriving communities. I very much look forward to our Community Councils playing a full part in this process.”
The new Scheme for the Establishment of Community Councils in Argyll and Bute was approved by the Council's Executive following a comprehensive review.
The Scheme sets out, in detail, the basis on which the local Community Council system will now operate.
Councillors also agreed that Community Council elections will take place on Thursday, October 29, unless a UK Parliamentary election is called before then.
The wide-ranging review aimed to ensure that Community Councils can make an effective contribution to community engagement and community planning developments which the Coucnil is promoting, giving Community Councils and communities a bigger say in how the Council and other public sector partners develop and shape services.
The review was progressed in two stages over a seven-month period and involved all Community Councils. The first stage was an “as is” look at how Community Councils operated, and the second invited all interested parties to comment on a “to be” vision for the future.
The Association of Argyll and Bute Community Councils was involved at every step of the review, with meetings being held to discuss progress and invite comments.
Council Leader Dick Walsh welcomed the adoption of the new Scheme, saying it was beneficial to the entire area to have as robust a Community Council structure as possible.
“The 56 distinct areas represented by our Community Councils provide a unique opportunity to get right to the heart of our local communities, and ensure that we plan in partnership for the future,” Councillor Walsh added.
“Community Councils have a vital role in the democratic process. The new Scheme will, I hope, strengthen their role as well as improve community representation and participation.”
He also urged members of the public to consider putting themselves forward for the October 29 elections, and Community Councils and existing Community Councillors to promote interest in standing for election.
“Being a Community Councillor is a very important role, and one which can be extremely rewarding,” Councillor Walsh said.
“Most people get involved to help improve their local area, whether by way of direct activities or by influencing decisions made by the Council and other public bodies.
“Argyll and Bute Council is committed to working closely with Community Councils to ensure that they can do this as effectively as possible.”
The new document incorporates model Standing Orders, a model Constitution, a list of Community Councils and a Best Practice Agreement, which includes a Code of Conduct for Community Councillors.
With the new structure in place, Community Councils are likely to have a role contributing to Argyll and Bute’s proposed Area Community Planning Groups. They will be able to make representations to public and private agencies more effectively on matters which they consider to be of local interest.
Councillor Walsh said: “Community Planning is about local organisations working together to improve services for their communities.
“Most importantly, it is about ensuring that local people are able to influence the decisions of the agencies which provide their services. That’s where Community Councils have a potentially major role to play.
“The Council places the Community Planning process very highly on its agenda. We want to see co-operation and partnership working have a positive impact on everyone’s lives and achieve sustainable, thriving communities. I very much look forward to our Community Councils playing a full part in this process.”
Port Ellen Maltings - Malt Silo Planning Application
Argyll and Bute Council
Development Services
Delegated or Committee Planning Application Report and Report of handling as required
by Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2008 relative to applications for Planning Permission or Planning
Permission in Principle
____________________________________________________________________________
Reference No: 09/00627/DET
Planning Hierarchy: Local Development
Applicant: Diageo
Proposal: Erection of two replacement malt/barley silos
Site Address: Port Ellen Maltings, Port Ellen, Isle of Islay
____________________________________________________________________________
DECISION ROUTE
(i) Local Government Scotland Act 1973
____________________________________________________________________________
(A) THE APPLICATION
(i) Development Requiring Express Planning Permission
• Erection of two replacement malt/barley silos
____________________________________________________________________________
(B) RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that Planning Permission be approved subject to the conditions and
reasons attached.
____________________________________________________________________________
(C) CONSULTATIONS:
Area Roads Manager (15.05.09) – No objection
Area Environmental Health Manager (11.05.09) – No objection
Highlands & Islands Airports Ltd. (15.05.09) – No objection
Health & Safety Executive (09.07.09) – No comment as this is not a notifiable site
____________________________________________________________________________
(D) SITE HISTORY:
Agenda Item 7
Page 99
01/89/01232 – Erection of two barley/malt silos – Approved 21st February 1990
____________________________________________________________________________
(E) PUBLICITY:
None required
____________________________________________________________________________
(F) REPRESENTATIONS:
Objection:
ACHA (Argyll Community Housing Association), Dalriada House, Lochnell Street,
Lochgilphead (14.05.09)
G Hamiltion, 3 Bayview, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
E Hamilton, 3 Bayview, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
Lachie & Margaret MacDonald, 6 Antrim View, Port Ellen (07.05.09)
R Baker, 12 Antrim View, Port Ellen (07.05.09)
Alison & Nigel MacTaggart, 28 Antrim View, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
Niall Colthart, 9 Bayview, Port Ellen (24.06.09)
98 signature petition submitted by G McKay of 1 Bayview, Port Ellen
Support:
John Grant, 88 Lennox Street, Port Ellen (28.05.09)
(i) Summary of issues raised
Letters of Objection:
• That, in view of the collapse of a previous silo, the proposal gives rise to an
unacceptable health and safety risk to the occupants of adjoining residential
property.
Comments: Planning decisions should always be made on planning grounds and
in the public interest. The planning system should not be used to secure
objectives that are more properly achieved under other legislation. The grant of
planning permission does not remove the need to seek other statutory consents
nor does it imply that these consents will be forthcoming. In this particular
instance the safety concerns raised are considered to be planning matters in so
much as they relate to a reasonable concern over to the proposed use of the site.
In considering what weight to give to this issue it is necessary to be aware that
the provisions of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations
1999 place an obligation upon the site operator to provide arrangements which
ensure the safety of employees and others affected by the operation of the site.
The applicant has provided supporting information which indicates that an
appropriate risk assessment of the proposal has been undertaken and, in seeking
to replace the silos, they have sought to identify and put in place adequate
Page 100
measures to mitigate for the shortcomings in the previous development which
resulted in their structural failure. In summary, the management of risk and
enforcement of site safety is subject to specific statutory regulation which is
separate from the planning system, I am satisfied that due consideration has
been given to the Health & Safety issues raised by objectors and given the
factors covered by other legislation together with the risk assessment carried out
by the applicant, I do not consider that these concerns raised by objectors, whilst
legitimate, should prevent the granting of Planning Permission.
• That, in view of the collapse of a previous silo and the safety issues raised
about the redevelopment of this site, that the replacement silos would be
better located at an alternative site within the malting complex.
Comments: An application for planning permission requires to be determined on
its own merits having regard to material planning considerations as they relate to
the site applied for. As advised above, I do not consider that there would be a
justification to refuse Planning Permission for the proposed site. In this respect
the issue of an alternative location is not a significant factor in the assessment of
the application.
• That the proposed silos are identical to the previous silo which collapsed with
the exception of an additional layer of powder coating – confirmation is
sought from Building Standards that this method will provide the necessary
structural integrity.
Comments: The proposed silos do not require to be the subject of a Building
Warrant application to the Council – the structures being exempt from control
under the Buildings (Scotland) Regulations. The applicant has however submitted
a design certificate issued by the silo manufacturer certifying the structural
stability of the vessels.
Letters of Support:
• That when the previous silo collapsed it was almost full yet the debris was
contained within 25 feet of the silo.
• That refusal of the proposal could have an adverse impact upon both the
local economy in respect of job losses in the event of the malting being
closed.
• That refusal of the proposal could have an adverse impact upon the transport
infrastructure of the island as a result of additional HGV movements required
to make up the shortfall in production from the malting restricting ferry space
for other traffic.
____________________________________________________________________________
(G) SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Has the application been the subject of:
(i) Environmental Statement: No
(ii) An appropriate assessment under the Conservation (Natural Habitats)
Regulations 1994: No
Page 101
(iii) A design or design/access statement: No
(iv) A report on the impact of the proposed development eg. Retail impact, transport
impact, noise impact, flood risk, drainage impact etc: No
(v) Support Statement:
The applicant has submitted a statement in support of the proposal which is
summarised as follows:
• That the previous silos were installed in 1991. They were of a standard grain
silo design as many similar vessels in use around the world; Diageo has
similar structures on other sites that have been installed without incident for
circa 35 years.
• One 950tonne capacity silo collapsed on 14th November 2008 whist
containing 810tonne of malt barley. No adverse weather conditions are
attributed to the collapse. The collapse involved a vertical tear in the sheeting
which propagated the entire height of the silo causing significant spillage of
malt barley into the adjacent area. No personnel, residents of adjacent
property or members of the general public were injured in the incident;
although 6 neighbouring houses were evacuated for 2½ days as a
precautionary measure whilst structural engineers and a demolition crew
undertook works on site.
• Subsequently, following investigation, the structural failure of the silo has
been attributed to significant corrosion on the corrugated sheets behind the
vertical steel stiffeners. A similar, previously undetected corrosion pattern
was also evident in the second silo which was demolished as a precautionary
measure following inspection. No clear initiating event has been established
for the collapse although it is thought possible that cooler temperatures
caused sufficient contraction in the corrugated sheeting which was enough to
cause the sheet material to fail along a corroded line. The silos were exposed
over their 17 year lifespan to both the marine/coastal environment and the
output from peat kilns which are drawn into this part of the site in particular
weather conditions. Investigation has shown that the corrosion was worst on
areas of the silo which were most sheltered from the wind and sun; areas
which are likely to take longer to dry out thus potentially accelerating
corrosive effects.
• In response to the structural failure of the silo Diageo have implemented an
enhanced inspection/maintenance regime with existing silos to be inspected
for similar corrosion (i.e. behind the vertical stiffeners). Silos located in a
Page 102
marine/coastal environment or which are subject to peated kiln exhaust
products are inspected first. A regular inspection regime is to be implemented
thereafter.
• Future installations in marine/coastal locations will receive enhanced
corrosion protection in the form of a high grade of galvanising followed by a
powder coating/epoxy based paint system to ensure a longer operating life.
• That three alternative solutions to the replacement of the silos in their original
location have been investigated, namely:
(i) Do Nothing: This option would prove extremely difficult to operate as the
timing of production commencement and product rest periods would become
finely balanced in respect of the storage capacity at the site. Not only would
the permanent loss of the two silos result in a loss of flexibility to store
surplus product during distillery shut down periods or to maintain production
where bad weather delays barley deliveries; during periods of maintenance
at the site it would also be necessary to ship in any shortfall of product from
the mainland. It would also require 5 of the 6 distilleries served by the site to
coincide their shut down period whereas at present this holiday/maintenance
period is spread across four months.
(ii) Rebuild Silos in Alternative Location: This option would entail the erection
of silos in locations where they would be visually prominent and impact upon
the setting of adjacent listed buildings. New conveyors to both fill and empty
the silos would need to connect to the current grain handling equipment and
would extend over a significant distance. The longer conveyor lengths would
increase the future operational and maintenance costs of the site. The risk
assessment for employee’s and site visitors remains the same as the
proposed replacement of the silos in their original location.
(iii) Build a Flat Barley Store and Smaller Malt Silos: This option would
require the erection of a flat barley store in the region of 42m x 30m x 11.5m,
probably on the site of the peat shed which would require to be rebuilt on the
village side of the site. A shed of this size would again be visually prominent
and impact upon the setting of adjacent listed buildings. Filling and emptying
the store would require conveying systems over a significant distance with
frequent vehicle movements around the site to support a 24/7 operation.
Again this would have an operational and maintenance impact for the future.
In addition some smaller (200tonne) malt storage would be required on the
site of the existing silo foundations.
• Diageo has been working with the Council’s Environmental Health team to
monitor emissions from the kilning process. Whilst it has been found that
Page 103
emissions are within the requirements of the National Air Quality Standards
the low stack design allows for plume grounding in certain weather
conditions. This has led to complaints from a number of neighbours in
addition to subjecting the silos to additional moisture levels. It is proposed to
seek planning permission in the near future for the erection of a higher, 37m
stack at a cost in excess of £1million during the annual site shut down to
resolve this problem.
• That in considering options to re-establish barley and malt storage that can
sustain production levels over the long term, the obligations under Health &
Safety legislation to both the company’s employees and neighbours has been
a primary consideration. The selected option to rebuild the silos upon the
existing foundations and reconnect them to the adjacent silo block and grain
handling conveyors is the best operational fit with other site equipment. The
proposed silos take account of the recommendations from the incident
investigation by having enhanced corrosion protection through the use of
powder coating. Powder coating will provide an additional protective layer
preventing chlorides from the coastal air attacking the galvanised finish on
the metal (effectively adding a second layer of protection). A revised
inspection and maintenance regime will be implemented; the inspections will
include a method of examining the interface between the vertical stiffener and
silo side sheeting. The current proposal address the requirement to improve
corrosion protection to prevent premature failure of the silos. Combined with
the inspection and maintenance programme it is believed that this reduces
the likelihood and therefore the residual risk of premature failure to a level
that is as low as practicable.
____________________________________________________________________________
(H) PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
(i) Is a Section 75 agreement required: No
____________________________________________________________________________
(I) Has a Direction been issued by Scottish Ministers in terms of Regulation 30, 31 or
32: No
(J) Section 25 of the Act; Development Plan and any other material considerations
over and above those listed above which have been taken into account in the
assessment of the application
(i) List of all Development Plan Policy considerations taken into account in
assessment of the application.
Page 104
‘Argyll and Bute Structure Plan’ 2002
STRAT DC 1 – Development within the Settlements
‘Argyll and Bute Local Plan’ 2009
LP ENV 1 – Development Impact on the General Environment
LP ENV 19 – Development Setting, Layout and Design
LP BUS 1 – Business and Industry Proposals in Existing Settlements
LP BAD 1 – Bad Neighbour Development
(ii) List of all other material planning considerations taken into account in the
assessment of the application, having due regard to Annex A of Circular
4/2009.
• Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (As amended);
• The design of the proposed development and its relationship to its
surroundings;
• View of consultees;
• The previous presence of identical development on the site for a significant
period of time;
• Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999;
• Eight letters of representation and a ninety-eight signature petition.
(K) Is the proposal a Schedule 2 Development not requiring an Environmental Impact
Assessment: No
(L) Has the application been the subject of statutory pre-application consultation
(PAC): No
(M) Has a sustainability check list been submitted: No
(N) Does the Council have an interest in the site: No
(O) Requirement for a hearing (PAN41 or other): No
The Planning Department has received seven letters and a ninety-eight signature
petition raising objection to the proposal and, one letter in support of the proposal –
Members are therefore advised that it is necessary to give consideration to holding a
discretionary hearing in advance of determining the application.
In this particular instance all bar one of the representations relate solely to perceived
health and safety risks associated with the proposed development. The management of
risk in respect of site health and safety is the subject of specific legislation it is the
responsibility of the site owners and operators. In such circumstances and taking into
account the comments on the representations and the assessment, it is not considered
necessary to convene a discretionary hearing prior to the determination if this
application.
Page 105
(P) Assessment and summary of determining issues and material considerations
• The proposal seeks to erect two malt/barley silos of identical siting, design and
appearance to two structures demolished in November 2008. The proposal is
considered to be consistent with the provisions of policies STRAT DC 1, LP ENV 1,
LP ENV 19, LP BUS 1 and LP BAD 1 of the Development Plan.
• Seven letters and a ninety-eight signature petition raising objection to the proposal
on the grounds of a perceived risk to health and safety.
• One letter in support of the proposal has been received.
(Q) Is the proposal consistent with the Development Plan: Yes
(R) Reasons why Planning Permission should be granted
The proposal relates to the replacement of a storage facility within an existing industrial
site. The proposed replacement silos are identical in siting, scale, design, finishes and
nature of use to those which previously stood in this location. The proposal involves the
redevelopment of brownfield land and is considered unlikely to give rise to adverse
impacts upon the amenity of adjacent residential property or upon the surrounding
landscape/townscape setting, nor does it give rise to additional demands in respect of
access or servicing. Consequently, the proposal is considered to be of a form, location
and scale which is consistent with the provisions of policies STRAT DC 1, LP ENV 1, LP
ENV 19, LP BUS 1 and LP BAD 1.
(S) Reasoned justification for a departure to the provisions of the Development Plan
Not applicable
(T) Need for notification to Scottish Ministers or Historic Scotland: No
Author of Report: Peter Bain Date: 4th August 2009
Reviewing Officer: Neil McKay Date: 5th August 2009
Angus Gilmour
Head of Planning
Page 106
Page 107
CONDITIONS AND REASONS RELATIVE TO APPLICATION REF. NO. 09/00627/DET
1. That the development to which this permission relates must be begun within three years
from the date of this permission.
Reason: In accordance with Section 58 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
2. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the
application form dated 30th April 2009 and the approved drawing reference numbers
AZ70402:28:010, AZ70402:28:011 and, AZ70402:28:012 unless the prior written approval of
the planning authority is obtained for other materials/finishes/for an amendment to the
approved details under Section 64 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in
accordance with the approved details.
NOTE TO APPLICANT
• In order to comply with Section 27A(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997, prior to works commencing on site it is the responsibility of the developer to complete
and submit the attached ‘Notice of Initiation of Development’ to the Planning Authority
specifying the date on which the development will start.
• In order to comply with Section 27B(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997 it is the responsibility of the developer to submit the attached ‘Notice of Completion’ to
the Planning Authority specifying the date upon which the development was completed.
Page 108
APPENDIX A – RELATIVE TO APPLICATION NUMBER: 09/00627/DET
PLANNING LAND USE AND POLICY ASSESSMENT
A. Settlement Strategy
The application site lies within the ‘settlement area’ for Port Ellen where in the provisions
of policies STRAT DC 1 and LP BUS 1 would support the principle of up to and including
‘medium’ scale business and industry development.
The proposal is ‘small’ scale in nature and is considered to be consistent with the
relevant provisions of policies STRAT DC 1 and LP BUS 1.
B. Location, Nature and Design of Proposed Development
The proposal relates to a 500sqm site located within the Port Ellen Maltings complex;
specifically the proposal seeks Planning Permission for the erection of two malt/barley
silos to replace two identical silos removed in November 2008 following the structural
failure of one silo.
The proposed silos are cylindrical structures which will be 17.2m (13.2m to eaves) in
height from an existing concrete base and 12.5m in diameter constructed for the purpose
of storing barley/malt barley in connection with the malting process undertaken onsite.
The proposed silos will be constructed in corrugated galvanised steel sheeting spanning
horizontally between vertical steel stiffeners; all sheeting and stiffeners shall be powder
coated, coloured goosewing grey (BS 00A05) to provide additional corrosion protection.
The proposal is identical in siting, design and appearance to that of the silos which
previously stood in this location. The Area Environmental Health Manager has not raised
objection to the proposal and in this respect confirms that the operation of the proposed
development will not give rise to a significant adverse impact upon the amenity of
existing adjacent residential property in respect of noise, vibration, smell, fumes, smoke,
ash, dust or grit. Similarly, given the previous presence of identical silos at this location,
the Planning Department does not view the proposal to give rise to concern in respect of
standards of privacy or daylight afforded to adjacent property. The Health and Safety
Executive have declined to comment on the proposed development as the proposal
does not lie with the safeguarding area for a notifiable hazardous installation. The
proposal is considered to be consistent with the requirements of policies LP BUS 1 and
LP BAD 1.
C. Built Environment
The proposed silos are identical in location and appearance to the silos demolished in
November 2008. The silos will sit adjacent to a significantly taller building of industrial
appearance and will be viewed in the context of the existing industrial use of the site.
In view of the above, the proposal will not, by virtue of its design, scale or siting, have an
adverse impact upon the surrounding landscape/townscape character and as such is
considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of policies LP ENV 19 and LP
BUS 1.
Page 109
IIt is noted that, in view of safety concerns expressed by the residents of property
adjoining the site, the applicant has investigated two alternative sites for the silos. Both
these sites have been ruled out as impractical in respect of their integration with the site
process as complex conveyor systems or substantial HGV movements would be
required to integrate these into the existing onsite process setup. It had also been noted
that the alternative sites were likely to raise concerns respectively in respect of impact
upon visual impact, residential amenity and the setting of listed buildings.
I. Road Network, Parking and Associated Transport Matters.
The proposal relates to the replacement of silos which previously existed on site as
recently as November 2008; access to the site will be as per existing arrangements; the
nature of the proposed development will not give rise to additional vehicle movements
on/off the site.
The Area Roads Manager has not raised any objections to the proposal; the proposal is
considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of policy LP BUS 1.
J. Infrastructure
The proposal relates to the replacement of silos on an existing serviced site; the nature
of the proposed development will not give rise to additional infrastructure requirements.
Consequently, the proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of
LP BUS 1.
Page 110
Development Services
Delegated or Committee Planning Application Report and Report of handling as required
by Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2008 relative to applications for Planning Permission or Planning
Permission in Principle
____________________________________________________________________________
Reference No: 09/00627/DET
Planning Hierarchy: Local Development
Applicant: Diageo
Proposal: Erection of two replacement malt/barley silos
Site Address: Port Ellen Maltings, Port Ellen, Isle of Islay
____________________________________________________________________________
DECISION ROUTE
(i) Local Government Scotland Act 1973
____________________________________________________________________________
(A) THE APPLICATION
(i) Development Requiring Express Planning Permission
• Erection of two replacement malt/barley silos
____________________________________________________________________________
(B) RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that Planning Permission be approved subject to the conditions and
reasons attached.
____________________________________________________________________________
(C) CONSULTATIONS:
Area Roads Manager (15.05.09) – No objection
Area Environmental Health Manager (11.05.09) – No objection
Highlands & Islands Airports Ltd. (15.05.09) – No objection
Health & Safety Executive (09.07.09) – No comment as this is not a notifiable site
____________________________________________________________________________
(D) SITE HISTORY:
Agenda Item 7
Page 99
01/89/01232 – Erection of two barley/malt silos – Approved 21st February 1990
____________________________________________________________________________
(E) PUBLICITY:
None required
____________________________________________________________________________
(F) REPRESENTATIONS:
Objection:
ACHA (Argyll Community Housing Association), Dalriada House, Lochnell Street,
Lochgilphead (14.05.09)
G Hamiltion, 3 Bayview, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
E Hamilton, 3 Bayview, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
Lachie & Margaret MacDonald, 6 Antrim View, Port Ellen (07.05.09)
R Baker, 12 Antrim View, Port Ellen (07.05.09)
Alison & Nigel MacTaggart, 28 Antrim View, Port Ellen (11.05.09)
Niall Colthart, 9 Bayview, Port Ellen (24.06.09)
98 signature petition submitted by G McKay of 1 Bayview, Port Ellen
Support:
John Grant, 88 Lennox Street, Port Ellen (28.05.09)
(i) Summary of issues raised
Letters of Objection:
• That, in view of the collapse of a previous silo, the proposal gives rise to an
unacceptable health and safety risk to the occupants of adjoining residential
property.
Comments: Planning decisions should always be made on planning grounds and
in the public interest. The planning system should not be used to secure
objectives that are more properly achieved under other legislation. The grant of
planning permission does not remove the need to seek other statutory consents
nor does it imply that these consents will be forthcoming. In this particular
instance the safety concerns raised are considered to be planning matters in so
much as they relate to a reasonable concern over to the proposed use of the site.
In considering what weight to give to this issue it is necessary to be aware that
the provisions of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations
1999 place an obligation upon the site operator to provide arrangements which
ensure the safety of employees and others affected by the operation of the site.
The applicant has provided supporting information which indicates that an
appropriate risk assessment of the proposal has been undertaken and, in seeking
to replace the silos, they have sought to identify and put in place adequate
Page 100
measures to mitigate for the shortcomings in the previous development which
resulted in their structural failure. In summary, the management of risk and
enforcement of site safety is subject to specific statutory regulation which is
separate from the planning system, I am satisfied that due consideration has
been given to the Health & Safety issues raised by objectors and given the
factors covered by other legislation together with the risk assessment carried out
by the applicant, I do not consider that these concerns raised by objectors, whilst
legitimate, should prevent the granting of Planning Permission.
• That, in view of the collapse of a previous silo and the safety issues raised
about the redevelopment of this site, that the replacement silos would be
better located at an alternative site within the malting complex.
Comments: An application for planning permission requires to be determined on
its own merits having regard to material planning considerations as they relate to
the site applied for. As advised above, I do not consider that there would be a
justification to refuse Planning Permission for the proposed site. In this respect
the issue of an alternative location is not a significant factor in the assessment of
the application.
• That the proposed silos are identical to the previous silo which collapsed with
the exception of an additional layer of powder coating – confirmation is
sought from Building Standards that this method will provide the necessary
structural integrity.
Comments: The proposed silos do not require to be the subject of a Building
Warrant application to the Council – the structures being exempt from control
under the Buildings (Scotland) Regulations. The applicant has however submitted
a design certificate issued by the silo manufacturer certifying the structural
stability of the vessels.
Letters of Support:
• That when the previous silo collapsed it was almost full yet the debris was
contained within 25 feet of the silo.
• That refusal of the proposal could have an adverse impact upon both the
local economy in respect of job losses in the event of the malting being
closed.
• That refusal of the proposal could have an adverse impact upon the transport
infrastructure of the island as a result of additional HGV movements required
to make up the shortfall in production from the malting restricting ferry space
for other traffic.
____________________________________________________________________________
(G) SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Has the application been the subject of:
(i) Environmental Statement: No
(ii) An appropriate assessment under the Conservation (Natural Habitats)
Regulations 1994: No
Page 101
(iii) A design or design/access statement: No
(iv) A report on the impact of the proposed development eg. Retail impact, transport
impact, noise impact, flood risk, drainage impact etc: No
(v) Support Statement:
The applicant has submitted a statement in support of the proposal which is
summarised as follows:
• That the previous silos were installed in 1991. They were of a standard grain
silo design as many similar vessels in use around the world; Diageo has
similar structures on other sites that have been installed without incident for
circa 35 years.
• One 950tonne capacity silo collapsed on 14th November 2008 whist
containing 810tonne of malt barley. No adverse weather conditions are
attributed to the collapse. The collapse involved a vertical tear in the sheeting
which propagated the entire height of the silo causing significant spillage of
malt barley into the adjacent area. No personnel, residents of adjacent
property or members of the general public were injured in the incident;
although 6 neighbouring houses were evacuated for 2½ days as a
precautionary measure whilst structural engineers and a demolition crew
undertook works on site.
• Subsequently, following investigation, the structural failure of the silo has
been attributed to significant corrosion on the corrugated sheets behind the
vertical steel stiffeners. A similar, previously undetected corrosion pattern
was also evident in the second silo which was demolished as a precautionary
measure following inspection. No clear initiating event has been established
for the collapse although it is thought possible that cooler temperatures
caused sufficient contraction in the corrugated sheeting which was enough to
cause the sheet material to fail along a corroded line. The silos were exposed
over their 17 year lifespan to both the marine/coastal environment and the
output from peat kilns which are drawn into this part of the site in particular
weather conditions. Investigation has shown that the corrosion was worst on
areas of the silo which were most sheltered from the wind and sun; areas
which are likely to take longer to dry out thus potentially accelerating
corrosive effects.
• In response to the structural failure of the silo Diageo have implemented an
enhanced inspection/maintenance regime with existing silos to be inspected
for similar corrosion (i.e. behind the vertical stiffeners). Silos located in a
Page 102
marine/coastal environment or which are subject to peated kiln exhaust
products are inspected first. A regular inspection regime is to be implemented
thereafter.
• Future installations in marine/coastal locations will receive enhanced
corrosion protection in the form of a high grade of galvanising followed by a
powder coating/epoxy based paint system to ensure a longer operating life.
• That three alternative solutions to the replacement of the silos in their original
location have been investigated, namely:
(i) Do Nothing: This option would prove extremely difficult to operate as the
timing of production commencement and product rest periods would become
finely balanced in respect of the storage capacity at the site. Not only would
the permanent loss of the two silos result in a loss of flexibility to store
surplus product during distillery shut down periods or to maintain production
where bad weather delays barley deliveries; during periods of maintenance
at the site it would also be necessary to ship in any shortfall of product from
the mainland. It would also require 5 of the 6 distilleries served by the site to
coincide their shut down period whereas at present this holiday/maintenance
period is spread across four months.
(ii) Rebuild Silos in Alternative Location: This option would entail the erection
of silos in locations where they would be visually prominent and impact upon
the setting of adjacent listed buildings. New conveyors to both fill and empty
the silos would need to connect to the current grain handling equipment and
would extend over a significant distance. The longer conveyor lengths would
increase the future operational and maintenance costs of the site. The risk
assessment for employee’s and site visitors remains the same as the
proposed replacement of the silos in their original location.
(iii) Build a Flat Barley Store and Smaller Malt Silos: This option would
require the erection of a flat barley store in the region of 42m x 30m x 11.5m,
probably on the site of the peat shed which would require to be rebuilt on the
village side of the site. A shed of this size would again be visually prominent
and impact upon the setting of adjacent listed buildings. Filling and emptying
the store would require conveying systems over a significant distance with
frequent vehicle movements around the site to support a 24/7 operation.
Again this would have an operational and maintenance impact for the future.
In addition some smaller (200tonne) malt storage would be required on the
site of the existing silo foundations.
• Diageo has been working with the Council’s Environmental Health team to
monitor emissions from the kilning process. Whilst it has been found that
Page 103
emissions are within the requirements of the National Air Quality Standards
the low stack design allows for plume grounding in certain weather
conditions. This has led to complaints from a number of neighbours in
addition to subjecting the silos to additional moisture levels. It is proposed to
seek planning permission in the near future for the erection of a higher, 37m
stack at a cost in excess of £1million during the annual site shut down to
resolve this problem.
• That in considering options to re-establish barley and malt storage that can
sustain production levels over the long term, the obligations under Health &
Safety legislation to both the company’s employees and neighbours has been
a primary consideration. The selected option to rebuild the silos upon the
existing foundations and reconnect them to the adjacent silo block and grain
handling conveyors is the best operational fit with other site equipment. The
proposed silos take account of the recommendations from the incident
investigation by having enhanced corrosion protection through the use of
powder coating. Powder coating will provide an additional protective layer
preventing chlorides from the coastal air attacking the galvanised finish on
the metal (effectively adding a second layer of protection). A revised
inspection and maintenance regime will be implemented; the inspections will
include a method of examining the interface between the vertical stiffener and
silo side sheeting. The current proposal address the requirement to improve
corrosion protection to prevent premature failure of the silos. Combined with
the inspection and maintenance programme it is believed that this reduces
the likelihood and therefore the residual risk of premature failure to a level
that is as low as practicable.
____________________________________________________________________________
(H) PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
(i) Is a Section 75 agreement required: No
____________________________________________________________________________
(I) Has a Direction been issued by Scottish Ministers in terms of Regulation 30, 31 or
32: No
(J) Section 25 of the Act; Development Plan and any other material considerations
over and above those listed above which have been taken into account in the
assessment of the application
(i) List of all Development Plan Policy considerations taken into account in
assessment of the application.
Page 104
‘Argyll and Bute Structure Plan’ 2002
STRAT DC 1 – Development within the Settlements
‘Argyll and Bute Local Plan’ 2009
LP ENV 1 – Development Impact on the General Environment
LP ENV 19 – Development Setting, Layout and Design
LP BUS 1 – Business and Industry Proposals in Existing Settlements
LP BAD 1 – Bad Neighbour Development
(ii) List of all other material planning considerations taken into account in the
assessment of the application, having due regard to Annex A of Circular
4/2009.
• Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (As amended);
• The design of the proposed development and its relationship to its
surroundings;
• View of consultees;
• The previous presence of identical development on the site for a significant
period of time;
• Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999;
• Eight letters of representation and a ninety-eight signature petition.
(K) Is the proposal a Schedule 2 Development not requiring an Environmental Impact
Assessment: No
(L) Has the application been the subject of statutory pre-application consultation
(PAC): No
(M) Has a sustainability check list been submitted: No
(N) Does the Council have an interest in the site: No
(O) Requirement for a hearing (PAN41 or other): No
The Planning Department has received seven letters and a ninety-eight signature
petition raising objection to the proposal and, one letter in support of the proposal –
Members are therefore advised that it is necessary to give consideration to holding a
discretionary hearing in advance of determining the application.
In this particular instance all bar one of the representations relate solely to perceived
health and safety risks associated with the proposed development. The management of
risk in respect of site health and safety is the subject of specific legislation it is the
responsibility of the site owners and operators. In such circumstances and taking into
account the comments on the representations and the assessment, it is not considered
necessary to convene a discretionary hearing prior to the determination if this
application.
Page 105
(P) Assessment and summary of determining issues and material considerations
• The proposal seeks to erect two malt/barley silos of identical siting, design and
appearance to two structures demolished in November 2008. The proposal is
considered to be consistent with the provisions of policies STRAT DC 1, LP ENV 1,
LP ENV 19, LP BUS 1 and LP BAD 1 of the Development Plan.
• Seven letters and a ninety-eight signature petition raising objection to the proposal
on the grounds of a perceived risk to health and safety.
• One letter in support of the proposal has been received.
(Q) Is the proposal consistent with the Development Plan: Yes
(R) Reasons why Planning Permission should be granted
The proposal relates to the replacement of a storage facility within an existing industrial
site. The proposed replacement silos are identical in siting, scale, design, finishes and
nature of use to those which previously stood in this location. The proposal involves the
redevelopment of brownfield land and is considered unlikely to give rise to adverse
impacts upon the amenity of adjacent residential property or upon the surrounding
landscape/townscape setting, nor does it give rise to additional demands in respect of
access or servicing. Consequently, the proposal is considered to be of a form, location
and scale which is consistent with the provisions of policies STRAT DC 1, LP ENV 1, LP
ENV 19, LP BUS 1 and LP BAD 1.
(S) Reasoned justification for a departure to the provisions of the Development Plan
Not applicable
(T) Need for notification to Scottish Ministers or Historic Scotland: No
Author of Report: Peter Bain Date: 4th August 2009
Reviewing Officer: Neil McKay Date: 5th August 2009
Angus Gilmour
Head of Planning
Page 106
Page 107
CONDITIONS AND REASONS RELATIVE TO APPLICATION REF. NO. 09/00627/DET
1. That the development to which this permission relates must be begun within three years
from the date of this permission.
Reason: In accordance with Section 58 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
2. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the
application form dated 30th April 2009 and the approved drawing reference numbers
AZ70402:28:010, AZ70402:28:011 and, AZ70402:28:012 unless the prior written approval of
the planning authority is obtained for other materials/finishes/for an amendment to the
approved details under Section 64 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.
Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in
accordance with the approved details.
NOTE TO APPLICANT
• In order to comply with Section 27A(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997, prior to works commencing on site it is the responsibility of the developer to complete
and submit the attached ‘Notice of Initiation of Development’ to the Planning Authority
specifying the date on which the development will start.
• In order to comply with Section 27B(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997 it is the responsibility of the developer to submit the attached ‘Notice of Completion’ to
the Planning Authority specifying the date upon which the development was completed.
Page 108
APPENDIX A – RELATIVE TO APPLICATION NUMBER: 09/00627/DET
PLANNING LAND USE AND POLICY ASSESSMENT
A. Settlement Strategy
The application site lies within the ‘settlement area’ for Port Ellen where in the provisions
of policies STRAT DC 1 and LP BUS 1 would support the principle of up to and including
‘medium’ scale business and industry development.
The proposal is ‘small’ scale in nature and is considered to be consistent with the
relevant provisions of policies STRAT DC 1 and LP BUS 1.
B. Location, Nature and Design of Proposed Development
The proposal relates to a 500sqm site located within the Port Ellen Maltings complex;
specifically the proposal seeks Planning Permission for the erection of two malt/barley
silos to replace two identical silos removed in November 2008 following the structural
failure of one silo.
The proposed silos are cylindrical structures which will be 17.2m (13.2m to eaves) in
height from an existing concrete base and 12.5m in diameter constructed for the purpose
of storing barley/malt barley in connection with the malting process undertaken onsite.
The proposed silos will be constructed in corrugated galvanised steel sheeting spanning
horizontally between vertical steel stiffeners; all sheeting and stiffeners shall be powder
coated, coloured goosewing grey (BS 00A05) to provide additional corrosion protection.
The proposal is identical in siting, design and appearance to that of the silos which
previously stood in this location. The Area Environmental Health Manager has not raised
objection to the proposal and in this respect confirms that the operation of the proposed
development will not give rise to a significant adverse impact upon the amenity of
existing adjacent residential property in respect of noise, vibration, smell, fumes, smoke,
ash, dust or grit. Similarly, given the previous presence of identical silos at this location,
the Planning Department does not view the proposal to give rise to concern in respect of
standards of privacy or daylight afforded to adjacent property. The Health and Safety
Executive have declined to comment on the proposed development as the proposal
does not lie with the safeguarding area for a notifiable hazardous installation. The
proposal is considered to be consistent with the requirements of policies LP BUS 1 and
LP BAD 1.
C. Built Environment
The proposed silos are identical in location and appearance to the silos demolished in
November 2008. The silos will sit adjacent to a significantly taller building of industrial
appearance and will be viewed in the context of the existing industrial use of the site.
In view of the above, the proposal will not, by virtue of its design, scale or siting, have an
adverse impact upon the surrounding landscape/townscape character and as such is
considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of policies LP ENV 19 and LP
BUS 1.
Page 109
IIt is noted that, in view of safety concerns expressed by the residents of property
adjoining the site, the applicant has investigated two alternative sites for the silos. Both
these sites have been ruled out as impractical in respect of their integration with the site
process as complex conveyor systems or substantial HGV movements would be
required to integrate these into the existing onsite process setup. It had also been noted
that the alternative sites were likely to raise concerns respectively in respect of impact
upon visual impact, residential amenity and the setting of listed buildings.
I. Road Network, Parking and Associated Transport Matters.
The proposal relates to the replacement of silos which previously existed on site as
recently as November 2008; access to the site will be as per existing arrangements; the
nature of the proposed development will not give rise to additional vehicle movements
on/off the site.
The Area Roads Manager has not raised any objections to the proposal; the proposal is
considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of policy LP BUS 1.
J. Infrastructure
The proposal relates to the replacement of silos on an existing serviced site; the nature
of the proposed development will not give rise to additional infrastructure requirements.
Consequently, the proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of
LP BUS 1.
Page 110
BBC ALBA - CALLING ALL TEENAGERS - ‘BREAB’ IS BACK
‘BREAB’ (‘Kick’), the reality series that follows six talented young Gaels on a journey of discovery, returns to our screens as the second series kicks off on BBC ALBA.
Following the success of series one, a new group of teenagers gather to face an array of tasks and this time the heat has been turned up on the teens and the challenges they face.
The six Gaelic speaking youngsters from regions around Scotland will spend two action-packed weeks together. The teens will be faced with cosying up to a boa constrictor, sampling edible insects, throwing themselves into a series of outdoor challenges, revamping a traditional waulking song (a Scottish folk song traditionally sung by women while waulking cloth), as well as paying a visit behind the scenes at T in the Park.
Will the young people complete all the challenges, will there be tears and will everyone get on?
Series producer, Donna L Murchison said: “Participating in Breab is one of the few platforms provided for young Gaels to have their say and showcase their talents and personalities. The teenagers demonstrate through their enthusiastic participation and teamwork their individual personalities, whilst forming lasting friendships with the other young people.
“Although their fluency in Gaelic varies, their love of the language is the one thing which they all have in common. Over the years, generations of young Gaels have been told that ‘having Gaelic might not do you any good but it won’t do you any harm.’ Seeing these teenagers chatting and joking away in Gaelic and undaunted by being in front of camera is proof positive that having Gaelic is a truly fantastic skill.”
The six teenagers taking part in Breab represent real teens growing up in rural and urban Scotland with Gaelic being spoken in the home or being learned in school. Picked from auditions across the country, the participants - David, Jessica, Nathan, Morag, Lewis and Megan - are hoping to be a real inspiration to young Gaelic learners and native speakers alike.
The chosen six who will participate in series two of Breab include:
David aged 16 from Lewis – David comes across as the quiet one but as the other participants discovered, he’s got a great sense of humour. David is a fluent Gaelic speaker and a laid back guy who loves nothing more than being out and about with his mates. He’s keen on fishing and football and has a part time job in a local restaurant. His ambition is to go to sea.
Jessica aged 16 from the west end of Glasgow – Jessica is a talented singer, plays the pipes and has been a regular Mod attendee for years. She loves shopping with her friends and describes herself as a chatterbox. Jessica splits her free time between Glasgow and Millport, where she has a part time job. Jessica’s aim is to study medicine.
Nathan aged 16 from Cumbernauld – Nathan is no stranger to TV, having appeared on Dè a Nis and starred in An Gille Fortanach. He’s in the cadets and says this instils discipline in him but he is a self confessed cheeky chappie. Nathan plays the pipes, guitar and drums. He’s currently raising funds for an aid trip to Africa.
Morag aged 16 from Ullapool – Morag loves singing and Highland dancing and is a mean rugby player and pizza maker. She loves Ullapool and spends much of her free time helping at her Granny’s croft, with her ambition being to own her own croft one day in her hometown. Morag also shows sheep at the Black Isle Show.
Lewis aged 16 from Bridge of Don, Aberdeen – Lewis’s loves in life include motorbikes, cars and hair straighteners - not necessarily in that order! Lewis is never short of something to say and is definitely the joker in the pack. His ambition is to work in a garage.
Megan aged 16 from Mallaig – Megan is a gifted fiddle player, traditional singer and actress, recently winning Best Young Actress at MG ALBA’s FilmG awards. Megan remains cool in a crisis and is undoubtedly the tidiest teenager in the series so far.
‘BREAB’ will be broadcast weekly, over six weeks, on BBC ALBA starting on Wednesday 2nd September at 18:00 and repeated the following week on Thursdays on BBC TWO.
Following the success of series one, a new group of teenagers gather to face an array of tasks and this time the heat has been turned up on the teens and the challenges they face.
The six Gaelic speaking youngsters from regions around Scotland will spend two action-packed weeks together. The teens will be faced with cosying up to a boa constrictor, sampling edible insects, throwing themselves into a series of outdoor challenges, revamping a traditional waulking song (a Scottish folk song traditionally sung by women while waulking cloth), as well as paying a visit behind the scenes at T in the Park.
Will the young people complete all the challenges, will there be tears and will everyone get on?
Series producer, Donna L Murchison said: “Participating in Breab is one of the few platforms provided for young Gaels to have their say and showcase their talents and personalities. The teenagers demonstrate through their enthusiastic participation and teamwork their individual personalities, whilst forming lasting friendships with the other young people.
“Although their fluency in Gaelic varies, their love of the language is the one thing which they all have in common. Over the years, generations of young Gaels have been told that ‘having Gaelic might not do you any good but it won’t do you any harm.’ Seeing these teenagers chatting and joking away in Gaelic and undaunted by being in front of camera is proof positive that having Gaelic is a truly fantastic skill.”
The six teenagers taking part in Breab represent real teens growing up in rural and urban Scotland with Gaelic being spoken in the home or being learned in school. Picked from auditions across the country, the participants - David, Jessica, Nathan, Morag, Lewis and Megan - are hoping to be a real inspiration to young Gaelic learners and native speakers alike.
The chosen six who will participate in series two of Breab include:
David aged 16 from Lewis – David comes across as the quiet one but as the other participants discovered, he’s got a great sense of humour. David is a fluent Gaelic speaker and a laid back guy who loves nothing more than being out and about with his mates. He’s keen on fishing and football and has a part time job in a local restaurant. His ambition is to go to sea.
Jessica aged 16 from the west end of Glasgow – Jessica is a talented singer, plays the pipes and has been a regular Mod attendee for years. She loves shopping with her friends and describes herself as a chatterbox. Jessica splits her free time between Glasgow and Millport, where she has a part time job. Jessica’s aim is to study medicine.
Nathan aged 16 from Cumbernauld – Nathan is no stranger to TV, having appeared on Dè a Nis and starred in An Gille Fortanach. He’s in the cadets and says this instils discipline in him but he is a self confessed cheeky chappie. Nathan plays the pipes, guitar and drums. He’s currently raising funds for an aid trip to Africa.
Morag aged 16 from Ullapool – Morag loves singing and Highland dancing and is a mean rugby player and pizza maker. She loves Ullapool and spends much of her free time helping at her Granny’s croft, with her ambition being to own her own croft one day in her hometown. Morag also shows sheep at the Black Isle Show.
Lewis aged 16 from Bridge of Don, Aberdeen – Lewis’s loves in life include motorbikes, cars and hair straighteners - not necessarily in that order! Lewis is never short of something to say and is definitely the joker in the pack. His ambition is to work in a garage.
Megan aged 16 from Mallaig – Megan is a gifted fiddle player, traditional singer and actress, recently winning Best Young Actress at MG ALBA’s FilmG awards. Megan remains cool in a crisis and is undoubtedly the tidiest teenager in the series so far.
‘BREAB’ will be broadcast weekly, over six weeks, on BBC ALBA starting on Wednesday 2nd September at 18:00 and repeated the following week on Thursdays on BBC TWO.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
